![]() The Nahuatl word for war is mītl chīmalli (literally “arrow” “shield”). A failed coronation campaign was seen as an extremely bad omen for the rule of a Tlatoani and could lead to rebellions of city states subjected by earlier rulers and to the Aztec nobility distrusting his ability to rule - this was the case for Tizoc who was poisoned by the Aztec nobles after several failed military campaigns. The first action of a ruler elect was always to stage a military campaign which served the dual purpose of showing his ability as a warrior and thus make it clear to subject polities that his rule would be as tough on any rebellious conduct as that of his predecessor, and to provide abundant captives for his coronation ceremony. Most warfare was primarily political and was driven by the expectations of the Aztec nobility for the Tlahtoāni to provide economic growth through expansion and the expectation of the commoners to have a chance of moving up in society through successful warfare. These dual objectives also influenced the kind of warfare practiced by the Aztecs. ![]() Captives lived in a house called a malcalli. The second objective was religious and socioeconomic: the taking of captives to be sacrificed in religious ceremonies. The first objective was political: the subjugation of enemy city states in order to exact tribute and expand Aztec political hegemony. There were two main objectives in Aztec warfare. Head of an Aztec warrior with a “temillotl” top knot,Museo de américa, Madrid, Spain.Ĭeramic statue depicting an Eagle Warrior Warfare was thus the main driving force of both the Aztec economy and religion. The sacrifice of war captives was an important part of many of the Aztec religious festivals. Aztec society was also centered around warfare: every Aztec male received basic military training from an early age and the only possibility of upwards social mobility for commoners (mācehualtin ) was through military achievement - especially the taking of captives (māltin, singular malli). The Aztec state was centered around political expansion and dominance of and exaction of tribute from other city states, and warfare was the basic dynamic force in Aztec politics. ![]() The Aztec armed forces were typically composed of a large number of commoners (yāōquīzqueh, “those who have gone to war”) who possessed only basic military training, and a smaller but still considerable number of professional warriors belonging to the nobility (pīpiltin ) and who were organized into warrior societies and ranked according to their achievements. Hope this article on the topic Did The Aztec Soldiers Kill Their Enemies Or Take Prisoners is useful to you.Īztec warfare concerns the aspects associated with the militaristic conventions, forces, weaponry and strategic expansions conducted by the Late Postclassic Aztec civilizations of Mesoamerica, including particularly the military history of the Aztec Triple Alliance involving the city-states of Tenochtitlan, Texcoco, Tlacopan and other allied polities of the central Mexican region. You are searching about Did The Aztec Soldiers Kill Their Enemies Or Take Prisoners, today we will share with you article about Did The Aztec Soldiers Kill Their Enemies Or Take Prisoners was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |